| |
Notes |
Linked to |
| 1 |
**WARNING**
Highly speculative - partly based on assumption that the 15 y/o Peter WATKINSON who appears in 1901 is the 5 y/o Peter RIMMER from 1891. He is not with the family in 1891.
There is also an "Esther" in the family by 1911
By 1911 the Watkinsons admit to 7 children, 6 surviving. The lost child must be Peter, as all the others are accounted for; but cannot find a death for either Peter Watkinson or Rimmer.
| Family: F3885
|
| 2 |
1901 Census has wife Ann as widowed, but 1911 says married 44 years | Family: F3194
|
| 3 |
1911 Census says 5 chlidren of the marriage of which 4 survive; who & where are the other 2? | Family: F2281
|
| 4 |
According to 1901 census son Frank was born in Sheffield; so this marriage looks plausible | Family: F973
|
| 5 |
According to the 1911 census they had been married 36 years, which makes it 1874/5. There is no John Halsall / Elizabeth Jane (or just Elizabeth). There is a Jane Barton though. | Family: F2127
|
| 6 |
Alternatively, at St Cuthberts North Meols there is John RIMMER m Alice WRIGHT 19 Jan 1789 | Family: F4405
|
| 7 |
Another IGI record gives date of marriage as 17 February 1814 | Family: F253
|
| 8 |
As usual the RIMMER name is confusing. In 1881 Mary & Elizabeth are living with their mother Alice RIMMER. However she is widowed, and on that census Jabez is unmarried. There is no record of a marriage for Jabez RIMMER that I can find. Elizabeth's baptism in 1878 says she is daughter of Jabez & Alice. What's going on??? | Family: F4851
|
| 9 |
Banns:
ALGAR William s/m otp &
KIRBY Sarah s/w of Carlton Colville
17th July at Barnby; 24th July at Mutford ; 7th August 1791 | Family: F3011
|
| 10 |
Based on 1911 census where they have been married 20 years | Family: F1134
|
| 11 |
Based on note in 1911 census that John Wignall married 30 years. There are other options. He always appears as "married" but no wife or family. No proof that Leonard is his child, though they are in the same household in 1901 and 1911 | Family: F4087
|
| 12 |
Bride's name given as Sarah | Family: F668
|
| 13 |
By Banns. Witnesses: William Moor, Mary Moor | Family: F277
|
| 14 |
Can't find a marriage for Jabez Rimmer | Family: F4850
|
| 15 |
Cannot find a record of the mariage. There is a Thomas Blundell m Clara Frith 1886, Mar Qtr, W Derby 8b 669 | Family: F1446
|
| 16 |
Cannot find any marriage in the bmd records yet | Family: F1569
|
| 17 |
Charles Beamish & Mary Ann Colman are given as witnesses to marriage of William Beamish & Mary Ann Simmonds, June 12 1864 | Family: F672
|
| 18 |
Ellen's mother is Jane HALL. Is husband Robert a fairly close relation? | Family: F1250
|
| 19 |
Evan & Elizabeth were witnesses to marriage of Robert Thomas and Jane Edwards (Evan's sister) | Family: F165
|
| 20 |
Family is nowhere to be seen after 1841 census | Family: F3722
|
| 21 |
Harriett Jinkerson is stated as widow, father Thomas Smith, labourer | Family: F279
|
| 22 |
Having problems with this family! Several of th echildren seem to have been christened twice | Family: F659
|
| 23 |
I can find no record of a marriage. I think Elizabeth is Elizabeth BROOKFIELD, who married a Harry BOWDEN in 1897 at St Peter Birkdale. However there is no record of his death, which would have to be soon after as Dan & Elizabeth claim to have been married 13 years in 1911. Unless of course he is not dead and they never married! | Family: F4852
|
| 24 |
I don't know what is going on here | Family: F1333
|
| 25 |
I don't know what is happening here!
In 1891 Arthur is living with his in-laws; while Harriet & the kids are with Arthur's mother Louisa and Leonora Holden (I guess a sister of Enoch, Arthur's father.
By 1901 Arthur is with "Kate E" listed as his wife, and the chidren. I cannot so far find a marriage record.
Nor can I find any death or re-marriage for Harriet | Family: F1335
|
| 26 |
I have put this family in because there is a link to two distinct areas of the tree. It's an amazing coincidence. | Family: F3961
|
| 27 |
I have put this family in because there is a link to two distinct areas of the tree. It's an amazing coincidence. | Family: F3962
|
| 28 |
I think 1734 rather than 1735 - the marriage bond is dated 1734 | Family: F4485
|
| 29 |
I think we are on fairly safe ground here. His age is consistent through the censuses, and after his sojourn in Crosby he returns to his rtoots in Marshside | Family: F2265
|
| 30 |
I wonder what Marcus was doing in Kent? There is another Marcus W Greaves marrying a Lily George 1920, st Giles, Middx. It must be Kathleen Jackson however as they then move back to Suffolk where their sons were born, and both Marcus and Kathleen are buried | Family: F3350
|
| 31 |
I'm not convinced that Hannah, Robert & Ruth belong to Mary J (nee Dyson) She & Albert did not marry until 1886 | Family: F4166
|
| 32 |
In 1871 George & Ellen Longton are sharing a house with Ellen's sister Ann, married name Ackers; and in 1881 Ann's son Richard is living with them as nephew | Family: F2269
|
| 33 |
In 1871 the couple are living with James & Alice HOWARD. Alice is the sister of Ann's father Hugh GREGSON, so I think it is likely to be the right Ann GREGSON | Family: F3918
|
| 34 |
In 1911 Emmiline/Emily is a HALSALL (widowed) | Family: F2719
|
| 35 |
In later censuses Margaret's birthplace is "Crossens", and in 1881 there is a William Henry CROPPER staying with them | Family: F4099
|
| 36 |
It looks like the right marriage. Ages & fathers are spot on. HOWEVER n 1881 he seems to have previously unknown siblings James & Mary staying | Family: F3204
|
| 37 |
It's odd - none of the children are present on th 1871 census, although 7 are of "home" age. I cannot find any of them (apart from Amos who is already married) | Family: F1265
|
| 38 |
James was 18, May 30?? | Family: F3365
|
| 39 |
Jan 5th, 12th, 19th | Family: F668
|
| 40 |
Likely candidate is Jane BALL
Mar 1853 Liverpool 8b 145
They have a 7 year old child in 1861 | Family: F1522
|
| 41 |
Marriage witnessed by Moses Williams, for whom Mary worked as house servant | Family: F46
|
| 42 |
Married at the Register Office | Family: F52
|
| 43 |
NB according to JO, Henry BLUNDELL married Mary WRIGHT, d/o William Wright, fisherman of Marshside, on 1 Dec 1860 at St Cuthberts. It does look like his first wife died in 1862 & he remarried soon after | Family: F3211
|
| 44 |
No sign of a marriage??? | Family: F4079
|
| 45 |
Not sure about this - 6 years before birth of first child? However they are surrrounded by Edwardsons in the 1901 census. Confirmed by 1911 census. First child is George Edwardson Cropper | Family: F1864
|
| 46 |
Not sure about this family - Oliver appears unmarried on the 1871 census, cannot find a marriage between an Oliver Ball and Eliza anywhere, Daughter Alice's age in 1891 places her birth pre 1871 (although 1881 date gives post 1871!) | Family: F3671
|
| 47 |
Not sure about this. JO notes another Margaret Blundell d. of John & Dorothy, but rejects this one because there is a daughter named Isabel, a name which does not figure either side of the John / Dorothy family. But the Crossens connection is strong & hard to ignore.
I'll put the family in as both sides are related to me anyway! Can always shuffle them around later | Family: F74
|
| 48 |
On the 1901 census Thomas & Alice Wright are living next door to Peter & Ellen Halsall and family in Old Park Lane. Alice is the right age to be Alice Halsall. Could Thomas be related to Alice's mother Ellen? | Family: F979
|
| 49 |
On the same day John Green married Alice Rimmer. Sophia was witness at their wedding, they at hers | Family: F1397
|
| 50 |
Over a year after birth of Benjamin? | Family: F1306
|
